Interfaith-Interracial-Class-Gender
“At-One-Ness”
Is
Benchmark of Year of Altruism's Success
How
do you ever really know when “good” is “good”? Was the movie
“good”? The pizza? The sermon? We hopefully grow up to realize
that – beyond genocide and the Lord's Prayer – the criteria for
“good” are largely subjective. I can't get dogmatic about
pineapple on pizza if you don't like it. I can't credibly tell you
that a preacher is good, if I can't really put my finger on what I
like about him.
Here
in Greenville, we are readying for a “Year of Altruism.” August
19 marks its first event, and it will continue through May of next
year. The objective of our programs is our desire to foster
idealism, compassion, altruism. Events will range from community
service projects, to interfaith worship, to family programs, to
learning opportunities, to theater, to an evening with Nobel Laureate
Elie Wiesel, to a concert by our Symphony that celebrates altruism.
But,
how will we really measure whether YOA has been “good”?
We
would certainly declare success if Greenville embraced a pervasive
sense of uplift and higher purpose, walking away with new resolve and
head held high. No question about that, even if we couldn't measure
it.
But,
there is also nothing wrong with setting specific benchmarks by which
we can measure the success of YOA. Financial solvency may be one. I
can already tell you that by that criterion, we will have failed.
Our financing is built on faith as much as on contributions. A full
house for Professor Wiesel, symphony, and interfaith service, would
certainly be a legitimate measure of success. The altruistic
projects we leave behind definitely meet the criteria.
Now,
let me tell you my own:
I
will know that we have succeeded when YOA becomes the catalyst to
unite this richly diverse community in “harmony and understanding,
sympathy and trust abounding.” (Sorry, I am still stuck on the
lyrics of “Hair.”).
Celebrating
diversity has become a basic criterion for YOA's success. But,
another measure outweighs it: Unity. Bridge-building. At-one-ness.
Mutual appreciation. Commitment to the values that unite us. YOA
will bring plenty of opportunities to ponder, discuss, exhort, about
the ideals of unity, and how to prevent them from breaking down.
But, more importantly, YOA will provide opportunities to
unpretentiously be at one with each other, at the same places, at the
same times – talking, enjoying, appreciating, learning,
celebrating, even grieving. It will happen only if we will put away
preconceptions and contrived boundaries, and delight in the essential
universality of the human spirit.
When
Congressman Jim Clyburn delivers his keynote on August 19, should we
regard it as an “African American” event? Isn't Jim Clyburn a
ranking member of the House, where he speaks for all of us and to
all of us?
What
about our commemoration of the 50th
anniversary of Dr. King's “Dream” speech on August 28? Do we
dare call that an “African American” program, particularly in
light of events of the past weeks?
Is
a symphony that celebrates altruism a “white” event?
Who
comes to a family concert? Only middle class kids, or disadvantaged
and homeless ones, too?
When
we observe the Holocaust memorial in March, is that a “Jewish”
event?
Is
the Warehouse production of “Angels in America” reserved for the
GLBT community?
When
we observe the National Day of Prayer, will it be a service for
liberal Christians, Jews, and other “religious exotics”? Or will
brother and sister Evangelicals raise their voices with ours?
YOA
is paying heavily to market programs that attract the broadest base
of our community. I already hear myself repeating, “This is an
interfaith-interracial event,” regardless of the group with which I
am speaking.
But,
good PR can do only so much. Building bridges of at-one-ness must
come from a soulful resolve that is at the essence of YOA: Put down
pretensions and nudge yourself outside the box, because that's where
all the best stuff is. A white kid must also celebrate Dr. King's
Dream. Straight folks must gain empathy for issues of being gay as
they watch “Angels in America.” Ultimately, it must come from
within.
So,
will YOA be “good”? May it be its lasting legacy. But, there is
a special yardstick that will measure its success. It is the extent
to which we achieve at-one-ness, not by analysis, but by simply,
universally, being people with people. You, all of you, are
cordially invited . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment